Tennessee (Again!) Struggles With Understanding The Federal Constitution, in the 21st Century: Prohibiting A Doctor's Gender Care (For Minors) -- A Loser.

We waited the weekend to cool off about this. But it is preposterous that the Sixth Circuit would even temporarily let such a law take effect.

This is in error, as a matter of federal law. The claim that any state legislature may take away federal constitutional rights (of privacy between doctor and patient -- by discriminating against only one class of patients). . . is transparently. . . incorrect.

More in the coming weeks.

Just like the Friends of Georges' challenge / outcome (also unique to Tennessee), the people of the Volunteer State will see their taxpayer dollars go to paying perhaps another $1 million -- for the challengers' legal fees -- for having to oppose a law that interferes with patient/doctor privacy, is facially invalid (discriminating against only one class of patient) and is a morally repugnant, repressive "law". Damnation.

नमस्ते