This is in error, as a matter of federal law. The claim that any state legislature may take away federal constitutional rights (of privacy between doctor and patient -- by discriminating against only one class of patients). . . is transparently. . . incorrect.
More in the coming weeks.
Just like the Friends of Georges' challenge / outcome (also unique to Tennessee), the people of the Volunteer State will see their taxpayer dollars go to paying perhaps another $1 million -- for the challengers' legal fees -- for having to oppose a law that interferes with patient/doctor privacy, is facially invalid (discriminating against only one class of patient) and is a morally repugnant, repressive "law". Damnation.
नमस्ते
No comments:
Post a Comment