The preznit cannot fire the Fed Chair. Nope.
Except for very narrow "for cause" -- affirmative, intentional misconduct (like, say. . . conviction of felonies -- oops. . . but that would be. . . yep, Tangerine 2.0, hisself -- and, should be fired! He remains a convicted financial frauds felon, after all).
But I digress. Where was I? Oh. Right.
Just yesterday, I quoted (what I had then hoped was an academic point). . . had hoped. . . would would never be a "live" discussion: the idea that Trump might try to "fire" or dismantle -- the Fed.
Now. . . just a day later, it is more or less. . . "live" -- at least in the sense that the orange dotard is raging on his dead letter social media service . . . about doing some version of it. It is a "no chance" possibility.
Chief J. Roberts will never G for it.
But the frothy hard right opines that maybe Baby T has a point. He does not -- unless he resigns at the same time, for being a convicted felon.
Geez -- who are these. . . malign morons, giving the "vacancy in chief" his sound-bites? Who?
नमस्ते







2 comments:
Again, I'm not optimistic: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-wins-supreme-court-ruling-threat-to-our-constitution/ss-AA1D7XmV?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=30ff7f6b6bf743bf8fddc5dc3a4635a7&ei=34
And not to be repetitive, but I continue to have faith that this ship was long ago designed -- and is in fact built -- to largely right itself. We shall see.
Post a Comment