Unsurprising. Aileen Cannon Was Just Handed Her Hind-Parts, By Her Betters, In The Eleventh Circuit. Ouch.

Just as expected.

Aileen Cannon -- in shilling for Tangerine -- debased her robes and the bench, in an astonishing fashion.

. . .This appeal requires us to consider whether the district court had jurisdiction to block the United States from using lawfully seized records in a criminal investigation.

The answer is no. . . .

In considering these arguments, we are faced with a choice: apply our usual test; drastically expand the availability of equitable jurisdiction for every subject of a search warrant; or carve out an unprecedented exception in our law for former presidents. We choose the first option. So the case must be dismissed. . . .

“It is a familiar rule that courts of equity do not ordinarily restrain criminal prosecutions.” Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 163 (1943). . . .

To create a special exception here would defy our Nation’s foundational principle that our law applies “to all, without regard to numbers, wealth, or rank.” State of Georgia v. Brailsford, 3 U.S. (3 Dall.) 1, 4 (1794). . . .

As we said -- she's a pure Tangerine shill -- and didn't even have a colorable argument to do what she originally did. Disgusting. But the right result has prevailed. Tangerine would be stupid to seek cert. at the Supremes. . . which is exactly why he. . . will. And lose, again. Bigly. Grin.

नमस्ते