Thursday, January 23, 2020

STEM Kids: Planetary Exploration Science Participation -- Help Name NASA's Next Mars Rover...


As regular readers by now well-know, I was [long ago] one of those small mountain town kids who got drawn into [by pure happen-stance] an early version of what became a grade school STEM program -- and I will be forever grateful. . . for the ways it enriched my sense of. . . the curious, on our planet, and perhaps more directly. . . off it.

So -- whether you are, know or have any kids -- or are just a kid at heart, do point their browsers, and yours -- to the open voting at NASA this week. There are nine finalist names to choose from. . . and everyone, young and old, is welcome to vote -- at that link.

I've posted some more background below, from the latest NASA 2020 Mars rover project; do go read it all:

. . . .The nine finalists (submission name, grade level, student name and state) are:

Endurance, K-4, Oliver Jacobs of Virginia [Ed. Nota Bene -- my personal vote!]

Tenacity, K-4, Eamon Reilly of Pennsylvania

Promise, K-4, Amira Shanshiry of Massachusetts

Perseverance, 5-8, Alexander Mather of Virginia

Vision, 5-8, Hadley Green of Mississippi

Clarity, 5-8, Nora Benitez of California

Ingenuity, 9-12, Vaneeza Rupani of Alabama

Fortitude, 9-12, Anthony Yoon of Oklahoma

Courage, 9-12, Tori Gray of Louisiana

The poll. . . will remain open through Jan. 27 until 9 p.m. PST (midnight EST). The results of the poll will be a consideration in the final naming selection. . . .


Onward, grinning -- in spite of the swirling white snows here. . . . Be excellent to all the school kids you meet -- encourage a sense of genuine wonder, coupled to solid scientific analysis, when it comes to all matters STEM.

We, collectively, need this next generation of scientists more than we perhaps ever have [note here particularly, the heavy Turkey-, India- and Russia-domiciled participation on the naming heatmap, above right -- this is of course, wonderful, but suggestive of strongly competitive academic programs leveraging our own science initiatives. . .], to step forward -- since the current administration is ignorantly and malevolently banning. . . the best and brightest, from many of the best math havens the world over, on purely pernicious discriminatory grounds — and intentionally, so. We cannot fall behind, here -- or we lose these same kids' futures.

नमस्ते

No comments: