That gentleman Jim Edwards, at B|net Pharma wrote an excellent piece earlier this week on this topic -- but due to Merck's belly-aching (Ron Rogers, do you recognize yourself here?), it got spiked (it credited my blog). Now it's back -- with direct links to the source material [and at my suggestion, no less]. It is fabulous.
It is devastatingly precise, and it is very fair. Well done, Jim! Again, do go read it all -- but here's a snippet:
. . . .Despite its public assurances and FCPA compliance programs, Merck nevertheless may have significant exposure in the investigation. The biggest source of vulnerability may be Schering-Plough, which Merck acquired in 2009. One ominous sign is that Schering-Plough has already been named in connection with an alleged foreign kickback scheme to promote the Hepatitis C drug PegIntron in Vietnam.
Schering-Plough stands accused of offering Vietnamese doctors a kickback of 10 to 30 percent of the medicine’s price, according to Vietnam’s English-language press. Vietnam’s Health Ministry investigated those reports, and in March 2010, the prime minister demanded penalties be imposed on Schering for paying monthly commissions of $26,300 to doctors who prescribed PegIntron. One doctor at a medical school was rumored, according to the local press, to also be a marketing director at Schering.
As Schering’s new parent, Merck assumes responsibility for any missteps Schering made prior to its acquisition. . . .
Indeed -- well-put, Jim.
1 comment:
Sorry for my bad english. Thank you so much for your good post. Your post helped me in my college assignment, If you can provide me more details please email me.
Post a Comment