Now, A Silly Attempt To "Stay" -- Any Ruling On Statute Of Limitations, From The Fitton-Shills...

The preposterous claim (just filed this afternoon) by the lawyers for the Fitton shills is that it will promote judicial efficiency -- to decide whether the Boutros-led USAs may intervene, BEFORE any ruling on whether the overall private suit was filed "out of time".

That is exactly the opposite of what the applicable federal procedural law would hold. The first question here, is whether ANYONE (governmental-, or private- party) may sue for supposed wrongs AFTER the statute of limitations has run. And certainly, the US government is deemed to be aware of as much at the Fitton shills were, when they were. And unless Fitton's ppl can prove that the statute doesn't apply to them, the doors to the courthouse are not just closed to them. . . they are deemed (under federal law) to have never opened. End of story.

Solely for a complete record, here is the nonsense plaintiffs' motion to stay the process -- now set to resolve discovery, on what the shills knew -- and when they knew it -- for the purpose of dismissing the entire case, as untimely.

[Still lurking. . . is the second prong of the dismissal tests, from Evanston -- that none of them suffered any injury, and have no standing -- since they never lived in Evanston, and have not owned property here during the relevant time frame. So they cannot complain. That too (as we've long shown) is a winner for Evanston, but Evanston has proposed doing the Statute of Limitations first, and then deposing these five shills, about their residences over the past 45 or so years.]

In any event, onward -- resolutely. Out.

नमस्ते