First Federal Suit Filed, In DC, To Enjoin Trump’s $1.8 Billion Slush Fund Attempt.

Overnight, at another property, an alias named Rigby McGuire and I were discussing how quickly federal suits might be filed -- against what is likely the most brazen act of corruption, by any president in the history of our nation. This purported but illicit $1.8 billion slush fund is certainly that.

And. . . we will need to wait no longer. The first of what will be many suits to enjoin this lawlessness has been docketed; this one on behalf of police officers injured at the Capitol — when the J6 insurrectionists and a rioting mob of thousands beat them with sticks and stanchions, and pummeled them with fists. Over and over, again -- shouting "kill that cop with his own gun!" (in one case).

You literally could not make up a more corrupt set of sociopathic jamokes, here. In any event, here's the full 29 page complaint at law, from today's filing in the federal courthouse in DC -- and a bit:

. . .[The Slush] Fund endangers the lives and safety of Plaintiffs Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges — officers who defended the Capitol on January 6, 2021 — in two ways. First, by its very existence, the Fund encourages those who enacted violence in the President’s name to continue to do so. Dunn and Hodges already face credible threats of death and violence on regular basis; the Fund substantially increases the danger.

Second, if allowed to begin making payments, the Fund will directly finance the violent operations of rioters, paramilitaries, and their supporters who threatened Plaintiffs’ lives that day, and continue to do so. . . .

To prevent the public financing of paramilitary organizations in the United States, and to protect Plaintiffs from further violence, the fund must be dissolved. Dunn and Hodges bring this case to obtain that relief. . . .

In January of this year, President Trump, his sons Eric and Donald Jr., and the Trump Organization sued the IRS for $10 billion in alleged damages arising from the 2017 and 2020 leaks of their tax returns. Compl., Trump v. IRS, No. 1:26-cv-20609 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 29, 2026), ECF No. 1. . . .

That lawsuit was frivolous. Because Trump, as the sitting President, was both the plaintiff and in direct control of all defendants, Trump v. IRS lacked adversity, meaning there was no Article III case or controversy, and no subject matter jurisdiction. Trump all but conceded the lack of adversity earlier this year, he described the case as requiring him to “work out a settlement with myself. . . .”

Yep. That’s gonna leave. . . a mark -- and as I guessed before, this (whatever it ends up being -- if from a Trump organization coffer) -- it will never be from our taxpayer money -- being sent out, to those violent reprobates. Trust that.

Out.

नमस्ते