There are clear injunctions in force, in federal court in Newark, against the Noemites making any additional (collateral) efforts to "remove" Mr. Khalil (a lawful US resident), for his prior, peaceful First Amendment activities.
But she continues to say she may try, via specious administrative agency moves, to avoid that clear federal injunction. Not so, says the able USDC Judge this morning -- by a clarifying opinion, and a further order:
. . .The "Respondents are preliminarily enjoined from seeking to remove the Petitioner from the United States based on the Secretary of State's determination." As a matter of plain meaning, "seeking" removal from the United States covers steps that come before physical removal from the United States. Detention is one example. Continuing to pursue charges is another.
Second, the "Respondents are preliminarily enjoined from seeking to remove the Petitioner from the United States based on the Secretary of State's determination."
Again as a matter of plain meaning, seeking removal "based on the Secretary of State's determination" includes all efforts to remove the Petitioner that are predicated on ("based on") the Secretary's determination.
This is not qualified.
This covers all efforts. Those that are solely based on the Secretary's determination. And also those that as a practical matter meaningfully rely on the Secretary's determination. "Based" covers both. . . .
Yikes. But dammit, if these people aren't. . . tediously malignant pin-heads. Just. . . damn.
Onward, to the USDC here in Nashville -- for Mr. Abrego Garcia's evidentiary hearing -- after I finish my breakfast. Stay tuned.
नमस्ते
1 comment:
Still hearing evidence; seen at 2:13 pm, but the DHS agent was destroyed on cross!
Completely unreliable, in his claimed process & testimony against Abrego!
Onward!
Post a Comment