In East Bay Sanctuary IV, Overnight The Noem / Rubio Tangeriners... Purport To File A "Statement" (Sworn?) As To Whether Trump's Orders Are Effective -- But Refused Putting It On The Public Docket.

I am all but certain that when the able USDC Judge Tigar sees this. . . he will say. . . no, these are the peoples' courts -- and this very newsworthy, nearly decade old immigrants' rights case. . . must be contucted in the sunlight.

We shall see, but this is what we last said on it all -- just a few weeks ago:

. . .The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint statement proposing how to proceed on remand. ECF No. 208. The Court agrees with the parties’ proposal to set a deadline for Defendants to notify the Court and Plaintiffs whether “the rule at issue in this case, Circumvention of Lawful Pathways, 88 Fed. Reg. 31,314 (May 16, 2023) (‘the Rule’),” which “will cease applying to new entrants after May 11, 2025,” has been extended. Id. at 1–2.

The Court also agrees that additional briefing would be helpful. However, the parties characterize the briefing as “supplemental motion for summary judgment brief[s],” id. at 2, when there is no motion for summary judgment pending. The Court construes the parties’ statement as requesting leave to file briefing regarding whether the Court’s summary judgment ruling, ECF No. 187, should be modified in light of the two issues noted in the Ninth Circuit’s remand order. . . .

Defendants to file statement regarding whether the Rule has been extended: May 20, 2025. . . .

The able Judge Tigar had ordered the government to file this statement two weeks ago, by today. Whatever these briefings address, they must be on the public docket. We need to see what Trumpians are trying to do -- in our name -- likely lawlessly.

Onward.

नमस्ते