Housekeeping: In The "Probationaries Firings" Class Action In SF (USDC Judge Alsup), Since Trump Appealed To The Ninth Cir., DOGE Need Not Answer Until End Of May, Now...

This is truly. . . trivia. But just to keep the calendars straight. . . .

The trial court here has already ruled against DOGE/Musk/Tangerine 2.0 -- as did the Ninth circuit. Then those jokers had then appealed their complete losses, to the Supremes -- where a 6-3 majority memo order said they could start the process over, with new notices -- ones that complied with law. That they've done.

Whilst we await that outcome, there is no need to have an answer to the formal original complaint, as the government is enjoined from additional action, under that memo. So the plaintiffs won't have to spin their wheels in motion practice at the trial court level for a bit yet. The status quo is in their favor:

. . .Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate to extend the time within which Defendants shall have to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 27, 2025. . . .

DATED: April 21, 2025 . . .

Now you know. More updates surely coming, this afternoon -- on the "wrongfully deported" humans cases, in the federal courts -- around the nation. Grin.

नमस्ते