We Should Note The One "Black Sharpie" TRO Case Decided On A Paucity Of Evidence In DC...

We are fair-minded.

And there has been one case where (the unions in this case) were not granted a TRO against the DOGE filching of private data. It was the even-handed sensible USDC Judge John Bates in DC -- and he denied it solely on inadequate evidence. It remains open litigation, with a preliminary injunction hearing approaching -- which means that as the record is more fully developed, he is likely to grant the injunction.

And even if he doesn't, there are at least three other TRO/prelim. inj. actions which block Musk, DOGE and Tangerine 2.0, nationwide. They will. . . persist.

Note that the above three part list does set out who is really in charge -- by orders of magnitude.

Musk (after his presser lording over Trump at the Resolute Desk in the White House) is in charge.

To the extent there is an adult in the room, it is Musk -- though I love that X, Musk's tot, mouthed "shut your f#cking mouth" to Trump -- and picked his nose. This is exactly what these dolts voted for. And Musk bought all of 1600 Penn.

D A M N.

In any event, here is that at best. . . minor case. Trump is still 1-for-22.

OUT.

नमस्ते