But it is something that needs. . . to be squelched: Shumate is arguing that Tangerine 2.0's supposed "executive orders" -- this time around -- are "beyond contestation". That they cannot be challenged in any court.
That voting him out, via impeachment. . . is the people's only redress. [I'll now wait until tonight, when the National Council of Nonprofits will answer this lunacy -- more fully.]
I guess Mr. Shumate was sick and/or traveling -- missed class, for the three weeks that 1Ls discuss Marbury v. Madison. [And likewise, in seventh grade civics -- when it was covered, as well. Hilariously, Shumate mentions Marbury in his memo at page 12 -- but wholly-ignores the direct holding of Marbury -- that the President's actions are all subject to judicial review. He mentions the non-controlling obiter dicta of the Nixon cases as well -- ones that ended without a definitive outcome, when Nixon resigned.]
Mr. Shumate made this goofy argument in this hasty, typo riddled filing -- the one I mentioned in passing, last night. On the Freeze.
But I made a new graphic, here -- just to be sure everyone's attention is focused on how. . . out of bounds these new jokers are. The orange rambler is no king. We fought a war or two about this. [Just ask the British.] This nonsense needs to be put down, in highly clear fashion. Onward.
नमस्ते
No comments:
Post a Comment