[U] Yawn. You See, In "Real Federal Courtrooms"... Real EVIDENCE Must Back Claims -- For Extraordinary Injunctions. Hilarious.

Updated 11.12.2021 @ 10 PM EST: Its on to the Supremes, then. Fifth Circuit. . . has ignored controlling law, about proving actual harm -- before injunctions may lie. End, update.

Apparently not so, if you are Tangerine / GOP / white-grievances-affiliated party, filing in Texas, though.

Overnight, we read a 20 page long turgid mess of internally-inconsistent arguments... asserting that the potential "future only" (and thus wholly-imaginary) impact on ability to find workers who are vaccinated... warrants the equivalent of a preliminary injunction, today.

Preposterous.

And the Fifth Circuit should say so. Will it? Who knows?

But at the Supremes, should they not say so -- it will be bounced summarily, by at least 6-3 margins.

Out, grinning -- what a passel of idiots. . . [Here is the actual black letter law, on it -- as we said yesterday].

नमस्ते