Showing posts with label Hatch Waxman Lusduna Nexvue Biosim Sanofi Insulin Glargine Injection 30 Months Patent Litigation July 20 2017. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hatch Waxman Lusduna Nexvue Biosim Sanofi Insulin Glargine Injection 30 Months Patent Litigation July 20 2017. Show all posts

Thursday, July 20, 2017

Merck Gets FDA Nod For Sanofi Biosim Insulin Glargine Injection -- But Must Now Litigate The Patent, Under Hatch-Waxman


Merck has (as of January 2017) already been given an EU clearance on this insulin bio-sim, and if I recall correctly, it is on sale throughout the EU. This is part of Merck's co-venture with Samsung Bioepis, as we've long reported.

The news this morning is that Kenilworth cleared FDA (older February 2014 background on it, here; February 2013 backgrounder here), but now must litigate with Sanofi, under the relevant Hatch-Waxman (up to 30 month) stay period. Of course, Merck could win out -- in the federal patent case, and launch sooner -- we shall see. From the NASDAQ-filed press release then -- a bit:

. . . .The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted [Merck/Samsung Bioepis] tentative approval for LUSDUNA Nexvue or insulin glargine injection 100 units/mL, a follow-on biologic basal insulin in a pre-filled dosing device. LUSDUNA Nexvue is being developed by Merck with funding from Samsung Bioepis.

With the tentative approval, LUSDUNA Nexvue has met all required regulatory standards for follow-on biologics of clinical and nonclinical safety, efficacy and quality, but is subject to an automatic stay due to a lawsuit from Sanofi claiming patent infringement. . . .


To this moment, we haven't reported on that piece of patent litigation very closely (as it was immaterial to Merck, until it secured FDA approval) -- but now we obviously will cover it -- and do so, closely. I'll get up to speed, on it -- with the baby on my lap, in the Loop -- tonight. Smile.

To be clear, at least two other life science major players have one bio-sim in the cue -- so the field could get crowded (background on Dr. Gottlieb's new initiative at FDA, here), and prices could drop -- pretty quickly.

In fairness to the historical record, Dr. Gottlieb is mostly putting forward a slightly-tweaked version of an early ObamaCare era proposal -- one that sort of fell by the wayside, in 2014. The idea is sound, and would benefit US consumers immensely, so I don't care if a Trump appointee says it is "new" (when it is in truth a revision of a 2012-13 proposed FDA policy) -- it remains a good idea, even if I know it was originally conceptualized under Mr. Obama. Now you know. Onward, into the rain -- but smiling, just the same. . . . whoosh!

नमस्ते