And The Trumpians Are Still INTENTIONALLY Violating Clear California Federal Court Orders... Damn -- Deporting People KNOWN To Be Covered By Settlements Trump 1.0 Signed.

There have been numerous class action settlement orders signed over the decades, by various federal agencies -- governing how people seeking asylum (with or without complete paperwork) must be treated. Certainly in Tangerine 1.0, we were surprised by how often those orders were being cruelly violated, in California, primarily by ICE and Border Patrol.

We are no longer surprised, here in Tangerine 2.0 -- but we are disgusted, by Team Bovino's clearly INTENTIONAL, DIRECT VIOLATIONS of federal court orders, over and over again -- as to people covered by the settlements, AND THUS LAWFULLY PRESENT I N THE US, despite the poppycok Noem pushes. See this, from yesterday in "El Centro" -- in the 2018 case being monitored by USDC Judge Dolly Gee, in LA:

. . .[Bovino / Noem] Defendants removed G.R.S.Y., a QAFM with valid parole, on December 11 to Guatemala, in violation of the Settlement and the Court’s stay of removals. Decl. of G.R.S.Y. (Jan. 27, 2026). Defendants should have been aware of G.R.S.Y.’s status as a QAFM because he applied for and received parole under the Ms. L. Settlement. See id. ¶ 2. Plaintiffs have asked Defendants whether they would be willing to return G.R.S.Y., and if so, whether they would do so at the government’s expense. As of the time of this filing, Plaintiffs have not received Defendants’ position. For the reasons set forth in Plaintiffs’ Motion to Return, the Court should order that G.R.S.Y. be returned at Defendants’ expense. . . .

[Bovino / Noem] Defendants removed class member F.S.G.A. on November 19, 2025. See Defs.’ Not. of Inadvertent Removal of Class Member, ECF No. 925; Decl. of Byoung Park (Dec. 30, 2025), ECF No. 925-1. Defendants did not check F.S.G.Y.’s class membership status when he entered ICE detention, see Park Decl. ¶ 8, and their declaration does not address multiple reasons ICE should have known he was a class member and not subject to removal. Defendants identified F.S.G.Y. as a class member in the course of the litigation. See Settlement § II.A, at 3, ECF No. 721-1. Thus, he appears on multiple lists of confirmed class members, including the list of identified and undisputed class members provided to Plaintiffs prior to Settlement approval, under Section II.A. of the Settlement. ECF No. 721-1 at 3; Fourth Suppl. Decl. of Daniel A. Galindo (Jan. 27, 2026). . . .

Separately, the day before F.S.G.Y. was removed, on December 18 at 1:29 PM, class counsel emailed Defendants to notify them that F.S.G.Y. was a class member and should not be removed under the Court’s August 26 Order, and counsel for Defendants informed Plaintiffs that this email was “promptly relayed” to Defendants. Fourth Suppl. Galindo Decl. ¶ 9 & Ex. A.

To help ensure further unlawful removals do not occur, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court order Defendants to provide an affidavit explaining:

1) Whether Defendants reviewed the list of identified Class Members provided to Plaintiffs prior to Settlement approval, see Section II.A. of the Settlement, to determine whether F.S.G.Y. was a class member, and if they did not do so, why not; and

2) Why Defendants removed F.S.G.Y. even after receiving Plaintiffs’ December 18 email notifying Defendants that F.S.G.Y. was a class member. . . .

This is banal, evil lunacy -- driven by Noem herself -- and Bovino, himself. And Stephen Miller. And. . . Tangerine 2.0.

नमस्ते