I now do know exactly why USDC Judge Waverly Crenshaw (quite correctly) did this, but given the irrelevant, and highly prejudicial nature of the latest "trial by ambush" government supposed proffers [paid recidivist "informants" -- to purportedly testify about uncharged, undocumented and irrelevant matters]. . . I suspect it will be rescheduled for the latter part of January 2026 -- after all the motions in limine are sorted out.
In any event, I'll be staying in the ice-box next week -- and likely shoveling again, by Sunday night or Monday. Heh. Here's that latest full-text order:
. . .ORDER as to Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia:
The evidentiary hearing scheduled on December 8 and 9, 2025 is CANCELLED pending further order of the Court.
Signed by District Judge Waverly D. Crenshaw, Jr on 12/4/2025. . . .
We are, however, approaching the point where. . . the quantum of evidence of vindictive and selective prosecution (against the Noemites) is so overwhelmingly-weighty, that Judge Crenshaw could dismiss the case, on the papers alone -- and set Mr. Abrego Garcia free -- without any other conditions of release. Indeed, the Noemites have tried to mislead the court in Maryland, falsely suggesting that very peaceful, prosperous Costa Rica would not easily accept any formal "asylees'" application from Mr. Abrego and his immediate family.
That nation has now averred in writing that it will. [And the asylees are willing to go live there, at least until Trump leaves office.] So much for my warmer weather getaway -- and watching of "The Nutcracker" (off ice), this year. The "on ice" version is a matinee on the thirteenth, up here. Grin.
नमस्ते
1 comment:
And, for when that time comes, this Colorado USDC case is going to be very persuasive:
https://tesla2reviewed.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/life-ramirez-noem-colo-2025.pdf
"...[Kristi Noem] shall refund the costs incurred by Ms. Dias Goncalves, J.S.T., and G.R.R. to obtain and post their bonds and shall remove their ankle monitors and terminate their reporting requirements and other conditions of release.
Ms. Dias Goncalves, J.S.T., and G.R.R. shall not be rearrested except upon a properly obtained administrative or judicial warrant. If they are rearrested, absent a material change in circumstances, they shall not be subjected to any period of detention nor any additional or more onerous release conditions than they are presently subject to.
Second, defendants shall not effect warrantless arrests in this District unless, pre-arrest, the arresting officer has probable cause to believe that the individual is in the United States in violation of United States immigration laws and probable cause that the person being arrested is likely to escape before a warrant can be obtained, as required by 8 U.S.C. § 1357(a)(2) and 8 C.F.R. § 287.8(2)...."
https://tesla2reviewed.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/life-ramirez-noem-colo-2025.pdf
Post a Comment