At the Supremes over the weekend, the Tangerine 2.0 forces openly admitted that their attack on birthright citizenship was a "modest" proposal. By that I assume they meant. . . "well, at least we aren't presently proposing. . . concentration camps."
But by saying a thing is only modestly unlawful (in one's own view, at least). . . doesn't make it in any manner allowable, old Tangerine.
. . .But at this stage, the government comes to this Court with a “modest” request: while the parties litigate weighty merits questions, the Court should “restrict the scope” of multiple preliminary injunctions that “purpor[t] to cover every person * * * in the country”. . .
So. . . we have a human right, for over a century -- and Trump thinks he can kill it, and say only people who sue, individually may keep it -- while he attempts to end a Constitutional guaranteed right -- with his lil' black Sharpie, alone?
That is the most preposterous thing I've read since. . . "three-fifths of a person is how we will count you."
Out.
नमस्ते
No comments:
Post a Comment