To be clear, the professors, as non-parties, seek to assert the "We, the people's" right -- in seeing that justice is done, in this criminal matter.
And to ensure that we, the people. . . are not once again subjected to the claims and corruptions of an "infallible" Faux-King, here over 240 years on. [See, A. Hamilton, in particular.]
[More precisely, to the extent Trump is thereby protecting someone who has covered up Trump's own crimes, that would violate "self-pardon" doctrines embedded in our Constitutional jurisprudence.]
To get to it, then -- the most important bit of this five page filing is highlighted in yellow, at right (click it to enlarge -- a clean version). The next question is whether the able USDC Judge will allow the actual brief to be filed. I predict she will.
And so, Roger Stone shouldn't get too terribly comfy -- at home. The power of pardon/commutation is not. . . absolute.
He may end up going inside, afterall.
नमस्ते
No comments:
Post a Comment