By way of contrast, I suspect that Pfizer's chairman and CEO thinks 45 offers him a chance at securing the regressive pro-capitalist tax and intellectual property policies he's long pined for (think of his twice failed $100-plus billion inversions, here). Remember, in the same time frame last year, Merck spent about $3.7 million while Pfizer spent about $4.1 million. [Amgen was up about a million dollars, in the same comparative periods -- to a little over $4 million.]
So (it would seem to me, at least) that Ian C. Read is spending -- like a sailor on leave in St. Croix, in 1768. [Q.: I wonder whether most of his shareholders support these forays.] Just take a look below, in orange, and compare the list to Merck's of earlier, in blue -- the tax dominated topics upon which Mr. Read has his people lobbying. . . would bear this conjecture out (especially when compared to the medical delivery dominated agenda Kenilworth pursued, as we indicated in the wee hours of this luminous but clear Wednesday morning):
. . . .▲ Trans Pacific Partnership Negotiations, Miscellaneous Tariff Bill, Trans-Atlantic trade & Investment Partnership, Canada IP/Trade Issues, South Africa IP Issues, China IP, Indonesia IP, Thailand IP, Korea Pricing Issues, United Nations Health Panel, G7/G20, APEC, OECD. . . .
▲ Drug Pricing, User Fees, Biosimilars Reimbursement. . . .
▲ Medicare Rebates/Medicare Part D, Medicare Part B CMMI Demonstration, Non-Interference, Re-Importation. . . .
▲ Comprehensive Tax Reform, Territorial Systems, Deferral, Border Adjustable Tax. . . .
▲ Omnibus Appropriations Bill, 2018 FDA & Labor/HHS Appropriation Bills. . . .
▲ Prescription Drug Abuse. . . .
Now you know. It seems Mr. Read is keenly interested in financial engineering -- and maybe not so much, in the actual delivery of medicines. [And yes, every narrative needs a foil, so he provides a convenient one this day. Smile. . . . To be clear(er), I would be careful about criticizing the 800 pound gorilla's new pink fur-fringed mu-mu, if my paycheck in part required friendly access to the same gorilla. But it. . . doesn't. Heh.] 'Tis a glorious morning! Go out and savor it. . . .
नमस्त
No comments:
Post a Comment