I was wrong -- earlier today, I guessed that 2013 combined leverage would approach 5 to 1. It actually is approaching 6 to 1, even on management's own calculations.
Where I come from, there used to be a difference between "pro forma" statements and "projected" financial tables. Moreover, when one assembled pro formas that included "projected future savings" -- one used to call the resulting tables "pro forma projected" selected financials.
Take a look (click to enlarge) -- but 5.88 to one is very highly levered -- with neither company reporting GAAP EPS last year (due to their respective interest expense burdens):
Were I being asked to lend into this scenario, I'd be concerned that -- even using managment's own Total Debt to EBITDA figures, management has chosen to round down, from 4.7 to 1 -- to 4.6 to 1, when conventional rounding rules (actual math) would require 4.7 to 1 -- as the expressed ratio.
This, I think, is a warning sign -- of management, private equity players and investment bankers who are pushing just a little too hard.
To think the would-be lenders don't see right through them is. . . a little unsophisticated. These folks are only hurting their own credibility -- if their intentions honorable, and their hearts pure. And, if they intend to fleece anyone -- this is a red flag: beware.
No comments:
Post a Comment