A few more details of the now operative three year collective bargaining agreement at Merck's West Point, Pennsylvania facility have emerged -- from the USW Local No. 10-86 members' forum (one of my earlier background posts, here):
. . . .I suggest contacting your shop steward or CAT team member, as there are many printed copies [of the proposed contract] circulating. . . .
In my opinion, the minuses outweigh the pluses. In short, there are annual wage increases over the three years of the contract of 2%, 2%, and 3% and a signing bonus of $3000 of you're eligible for full COLA ($2500 if you have not reached your full COLA). Section 23.2 and section 12.7 are troubling -- 23.2 gives the Company right of assignment (in a merger, reverse merger or other organic transaction, in whole or in part).
Section 12.7 gives employees the right to bypass the union concerning representation during the grievance process, a provision that is of questionablelegality, at least in the state of Pennsylvania. Also eroded are the production bonus, disciplinary process, sick day payment, life insurance coverage, etc. The contract implements a two tier wage structure with new hires starting at 65% of full rate -- with a "catch-up" clause, spread over a 10 year period. . . .
[Ed. Note: slightly edited, very small changes, for clarity and context.]
My reaction? These were likely the best terms reasonably available, given the overall economic situation, and Merck's relentless drive to downsize its workforce by an additional 15 percent after the Schering-Plough bust-up closing, back in November 2009 (on top of all the other downsizings over the past three years).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8059/b80598e9456c6b8bf357b4e937c00bf4f7c17609" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment