I haven't linked the fine Ninth Cir. remand order, because it is unsurprising, and correct as a matter of law. The able USDC Judge Tigar in Oakland is already underway, in getting a record put together, from the parties, to address the Hippocratic standing argument -- and the scope of prior rules and orders (and Trump's attempts to end them by Sharpie scribbles -- there are reliance interests a-go-go there).
Mostly, I wanted to leave this one here -- so that we may marvel at the hubris of the one conservative's dissent.
For well-over 100 years, nationwide injunctions from federal courts have prevented people from violating others' Constitutional rights. [Here think of George Wallace barring the doors of the University of Alabama to people of color.]
But this VanDyke guy would tell us that. . . this system of checks and balances is "getting in the way of" Tangerine 2.0's lawless cruelty against primarily brown people -- who've had the temerity to join us, seeking nothing -- but a better life, for their children.
I am sick to death of these old (almost uniformly mediocre whyte) men whining that they can't. . . get old Jim Crow back.
That is all.
नमस्ते
No comments:
Post a Comment